
From the "Happy Birthday" Department ::
I finally bought a Mac the other day. Actually it was on the fifth anniversary of the launch of their highly regarded Mac OS X - pure coincidence really. After jumping in head first and being wet for a little over a week I've given a lot of thought as to why it doesn't have a lot more market share.
After all..., OS X relies heavily on FreeBSD, perhaps the single most significant unsung hero of the whole technology revolution - it's well thought out, reasonably secure (even more so if you go for OpenBSD), easy to understand (a ton more logical in it's layout and design than Windows, and I'm an MCSE), and the Mac OS X flavor is much easier to look at (I'm also a graphic designer). Speaking of which, the "X" graphic you see above is the "X" from a font that I'm working on - I'm calling it "Flat Broke Mountain" - while I toil away at font design here in the middle of "Oil Patch Central", those around me are pulling in obscene wages for mindless "Oil Patch Jobs". That's telling you, in a round about way, it isn't going to be a "free font".
OK..., let's get back on track here. The reason I think it hasn't caught on the way it should have is that it relies, for the most part, on proprietary hardware. If you could imagine a scenario where Mac OS X ran on exactly the same commodity hardware as Windows? Put a reasonable price on each operating system - say a hundred bucks or so - and I would suspect that Mac OS X would garner a much larger slice of the consumer operating system market than it currently does. For right now it might be a "dual boot" situation but with the advances in CPU design it could be nothing more than a "hot key" switch in a very short period of time. We're almost there right now and with the ongoing delays of Microsoft's Vista it just may be the dawn of a new era where the Mac moves beyond "niche" market.
One of these, for the moment, fictitious machines would really appeal to somebody like me and I'm assuming a lot of others. In the graphic design industry the Mac has been "thee" machine for quite some time except in the "sign making" sector of the graphic design industry where it's been the PC that has ruled. As near as I can tell, the reason for this discrepancy has been the fact that PC's where the first to have the capability to drive vinyl cutting plotters and CNC 3D routers while the Macs where tweaked to provide optimal output to paper in it's many forms.
As much as I like my new Mac Mini I still require a PC for CorelDraw X3 and the ability to send those files to my Summa vinyl cutter. I'm trying to make the total switch but Adobe Illustrator just doesn't compare to CorelDraw in ease of use or feature set - a limp apology to all you Adobe zealots out there but it's a bitter reality - Illustrator is highly overrated.
Forget all the nonesense about Macs only being good for doing graphics or that there is limited software available or any of the reasons you might come up with for not considering a Mac. I've been involved in the IT/Technology/Computer industry for the better part of fifteen years and I only wish I would have taken up a Mac many years ago. I'm pretty certain it would have had a positive impact on the love/hate relationship I've had with technology over the years.
Check back regularly, no telling what little nugget of gnarled knowledge or whimsical wisdom you're going to unearth here but it could be a 'McNugget' - and you just know those are good for you.
Note::
These headlines rotated, updated & barbecued throughout the day. Enjoy!
Hasta La L8r
Señor Apple d00d - you're bad to the core!